Introduction
In today’s demanding public safety environment, the physiological demands placed on police officers, firefighters, and other tactical professionals are significant, and often underappreciated. Despite advances in technology, gear, and procedures, the human body remains the essential platform for mission success. Not our weapons systems, gear, or vehicles. Our people are the most critical asset. Among the various physiological traits that underpin operational performance, aerobic capacity, most commonly measured as VO₂ max, stands out as one of the most predictive of job readiness, injury resilience, and long-term health outcomes. As leaders in public safety health and wellness programs, it is critical to understand why aerobic fitness deserves strategic attention, not just for compliance or tradition, but because it fundamentally supports performance, safety, and longevity in the line of duty.
Defining Aerobic Capacity
Aerobic capacity (VO₂ max) refers to the maximum amount of oxygen the body can utilize for energy production during intense exercise. It is typically expressed in either absolute terms (liters per minute) or relative terms (milliliters per kilogram per minute), with the latter accounting for differences in body mass. VO₂ max is widely recognized as the gold standard for assessing cardiorespiratory fitness, which in turn reflects the efficiency of the heart, lungs, and muscles to work together during sustained activity (Bassett & Howley, 2000).
In tactical professions, aerobic capacity is more than a clinical measure, it is a direct indicator of operational readiness. Firefighting, policing, and emergency response require repeated bouts of high-intensity activity often performed while under significant external load (e.g., turnout gear, ballistic vests), in extreme temperatures, and under time constraints. Often without warning or thorough warm up which compounds the importance of having a strong engine capable of switching on quickly. In such environments, aerobic fitness can determine whether a responder completes a task, prevents injury, or survives a cardiovascular event.
Operational Relevance for Firefighters and Police Officers
Numerous studies have demonstrated the relationship between VO₂ max and performance on occupational tasks. For firefighters, this includes stair climbs, search-and-rescue drills, hose drags, and victim carries, all of which require sustained submaximal effort punctuated by anaerobic bursts. Research from Sothmann et al. (1992) and subsequent follow-up studies (Harvey et al., 2008; Abel et al., 2015) found that VO₂ max values below 42 ml/kg/min were associated with higher failure rates on simulated fireground tasks. These thresholds are echoed in U.S. and international fire academies, where lower VO₂ max values have been linked to increased dropout and injury rates (Orr et al., 2021).
For police officers, aerobic capacity plays a similarly crucial role. While daily duties may involve prolonged sedentary periods, real-time response scenarios, pursuits, physical altercations, and dynamic threat engagements, require a rapid shift into high metabolic demand. Officers with higher VO₂ max levels demonstrate better tactical decision-making under stress, faster recovery, and lower risk of cardiovascular events during exertion (Dawes et al., 2016). Importantly, these benefits extend beyond acute incidents; aerobic fitness is associated with improved sleep, reduced anxiety, and better resilience to shift work-related stress (Carter et al., 2020).
Research Highlights: VO₂ Max as a Predictor of Performance and Health
A growing body of occupational health research validates VO₂ max as one of the strongest single predictors of public safety performance and longevity. Key findings include:
- Job task simulation success: Several studies have shown a strong correlation between relative VO₂ max and success in firefighter simulation tests, such as the Candidate Physical Ability Test (CPAT) and other job-specific evaluations (Rhea et al., 2004; Michaelides et al., 2011). Those with VO₂ max values above 45 ml/kg/min were consistently more likely to complete tasks within time limits.
- Injury prevention: Tactical athletes with higher aerobic capacity experience fewer musculoskeletal injuries. A study by Orr et al. (2022) found that every 1 ml/kg/min increase in VO₂ max was associated with a reduced risk of training-related injuries in both military and firefighter populations.
- Cardiovascular risk reduction: Perhaps most compelling is the association between aerobic fitness and long-term health. A landmark study by Blair et al. (1989) showed that higher VO₂ max is inversely related to mortality from cardiovascular disease, a leading cause of line-of-duty death among firefighters. Recent fire service-specific data supports this connection, with subclinical atherosclerosis and hypertensive risk being significantly lower in more aerobically fit individuals (Smith et al., 2021).
- Psychophysiological resilience: High aerobic fitness supports better stress recovery and autonomic balance, a crucial factor for occupations exposed to traumatic events. Research in police officers has found links between higher VO₂ max and lower levels of inflammatory markers, improved heart rate variability, and reduced incidence of burnout (Anderson et al., 2019).
Implementation: Moving from Insight to Action
Given its operational importance, VO₂ max should be more than a number on a report—it should be a central metric in department health and wellness strategies. Departments seeking to improve or sustain aerobic fitness across their workforce can consider several practical approaches:
- Assessment-Driven Programs: Regular VO₂ max testing (or validated submaximal alternatives like the 1.5-mile run, step tests, or InBody VO₂ prediction models) can establish baselines and track progress. This allows for individualized fitness planning and early intervention when decline is observed.
- Job-Specific Conditioning: Programs should include structured aerobic training that mimics operational tasks, stair intervals in full gear, sled drags, circuit training, or loaded marches. These modalities improve both central cardiovascular conditioning and peripheral muscular endurance.
- Policy Integration: Leaders can support aerobic capacity development by embedding fitness into policies, whether through wellness incentives, mandatory training periods, or integration with annual physicals. Including aerobic benchmarks in medical evaluations encourages accountability and underscores their importance.
- Cultural Reinforcement: Perhaps most importantly, aerobic training must be normalized within department culture. When leadership models fitness, when units train together, and when aerobic capacity is linked to performance, not aesthetics or stigma, buy-in increases. Departments with peer fitness leaders or embedded wellness coaches often see better adherence and improved outcomes.
Conclusion
Aerobic capacity remains a cornerstone of tactical readiness, health, and performance in the fire service, law enforcement, and public safety at large. With strong evidence linking VO₂ max to operational effectiveness, injury prevention, and long-term cardiovascular health, public safety leaders cannot afford to treat aerobic fitness as optional. It is not merely a component of general health, it is a mission-critical and occupationally relevant capability. Departments that prioritize, assess, and develop aerobic capacity within their ranks are better equipped to serve the community, protect their personnel, and sustain a resilient, high-performing workforce.
References
Abel, M. G., Mortara, A. J., & Pettitt, R. W. (2015). Evaluation of physical fitness measures for predicting firefighter ability. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 29(6), 1613–1620. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000000771
Anderson, G. S., Di Nota, P. M., Metz, G. A. S., & Andersen, J. P. (2019). The impact of acute stress physiology on skilled performance and decision-making: A review of neurocognitive mechanisms and countermeasures. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 728. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00728
Bassett, D. R., & Howley, E. T. (2000). Limiting factors for maximum oxygen uptake and determinants of endurance performance. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 32(1), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200001000-00012
Blair, S. N., Kohl, H. W., Paffenbarger, R. S., Clark, D. G., Cooper, K. H., & Gibbons, L. W. (1989). Physical fitness and all-cause mortality: A prospective study of healthy men and women. JAMA, 262(17), 2395–2401. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1989.03430170057028
Carter, J. B., Banister, E. W., & Blaber, A. P. (2020). Effect of endurance exercise on autonomic control of heart rate. Sports Medicine, 33(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200333010-00003
Dawes, J. J., Orr, R. M., Siekaniec, C. L., Vanderwoude, A. A., & Pope, R. R. (2016). Associations between anthropometric characteristics and physical performance in male law enforcement officers: A retrospective cohort study. Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 28, 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40557-016-0112-5
Harvey, M. A., Kraemer, J. L., Sharratt, M. T., & Hughson, R. L. (2008). Responses of firefighters to fire fighting activities: Predicting cardiovascular fitness. Ergonomics, 51(7), 1023–1033. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130801915243
Michaelides, M. A., Parpa, K. M., Henry, L. J., Thompson, G. B., & Brown, B. S. (2011). Assessment of physical fitness aspects and their relationship to firefighters’ job abilities. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 25(4), 956–965. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cc2296
Orr, R. M., Pope, R., Peterson, S., Hinton, B., & Stierli, M. (2021). The relationship between physical fitness and injury in tactical populations: A systematic review. Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 33, 14. https://doi.org/10.35371/aoem.2021.33.e14
Rhea, M. R., Alvar, B. A., & Gray, R. (2004). Physical fitness and job performance of firefighters. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 18(2), 348–352. https://doi.org/10.1519/R-13212.1
Smith, D. L., DeBlois, J. P., Kales, S. N., & Horn, G. P. (2021). Cardiovascular strain of fire service: Epidemiology, prevention, and mitigation. Annual Review of Public Health, 42, 313–333. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-103345
Sothmann, M. S., Gebhardt, D. L., Baker, T. A., Kastello, G. M., & Sheppard, V. A. (1992). Performance requirements of physically strenuous occupations: Validating minimum standards for muscular strength and endurance. Ergonomics, 35(8), 945–954. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139208967385